§ The result
Fuel50 leads DevSkiller on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Fuel50 (Sourcing) opens a 19-point lead on DevSkiller (Assessment), 58 to 39. DevSkiller is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Fuel50 takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Customer Documentation, DevSkiller 58 to Fuel50 62. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — DevSkiller 22, Fuel50 68 — and at an 18% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Fuel50 holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Vendor profile
Fuel50
Fuel50 is an AI internal talent marketplace and workforce-transformation platform that matches employees to internal roles, gigs, mentors, learning and career paths, and fit-scores and ranks internal candidates for open roles and succession pipelines, using a skills ontology curated by in-house I/O psychologists.
§ The record
DevSkiller is filed under Assessment AI, Fuel50 under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | DevSkiller | Fuel50 |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | PL | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
DevSkiller 22 · Fuel50 68
8.3 weighted points to Fuel50
20% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
DevSkiller 35 · Fuel50 70
7.0 weighted points to Fuel50
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
DevSkiller 52 · Fuel50 64
1.8 weighted points to Fuel50
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
DevSkiller 25 · Fuel50 32
1.1 weighted points to Fuel50
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
DevSkiller 55 · Fuel50 61
0.7 weighted points to Fuel50
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
DevSkiller 58 · Fuel50 62
0.3 weighted points to Fuel50
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -19.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -19.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus Fuel50.
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | Fuel50 | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 70 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 68 | -46 | -8.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 32 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 64 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 61 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 40 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 58 (F) | -19 | -19.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | Fuel50 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Fuel50 has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller and Fuel50 sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for Fuel50, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Fuel50 last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next