§ The result
HeyMilo leads DevSkiller on all 7 criteria.
HeyMilo finishes 22 points clear of DevSkiller under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 39 (F) — across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria, DevSkiller none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, DevSkiller 40 to HeyMilo 46. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — DevSkiller 22, HeyMilo 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
DevSkiller is filed under Assessment AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | DevSkiller | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | PL | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
DevSkiller 22 · HeyMilo 83
11.0 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
DevSkiller 35 · HeyMilo 58
4.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
DevSkiller 25 · HeyMilo 42
2.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
DevSkiller 52 · HeyMilo 62
1.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
DevSkiller 55 · HeyMilo 64
1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
DevSkiller 40 · HeyMilo 46
0.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
DevSkiller 58 · HeyMilo 66
0.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -22.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -22.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 58 | -23 | -4.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 83 | -61 | -11.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 62 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 46 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 61 (D) | -22 | -22.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next