§ The result
DevSkiller leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
DevSkiller, filed under Assessment, comes out 10 points above JobDiva, filed under ATS-integrated: 39 against 29 under rubric v1.0. DevSkiller takes all 7 criteria from JobDiva without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is FRIA Support, DevSkiller 25 to JobDiva 22. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (DevSkiller 58, JobDiva 42) and Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (DevSkiller 52, JobDiva 38), the second being 22% of the weighted advantage DevSkiller holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
DevSkiller is filed under Assessment AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only DevSkiller is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | DevSkiller | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | PL | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 22% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
DevSkiller 52 · JobDiva 38
2.1 weighted points to DevSkiller
12% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
DevSkiller 55 · JobDiva 40
1.8 weighted points to DevSkiller
20% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
DevSkiller 35 · JobDiva 28
1.4 weighted points to DevSkiller
8% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
DevSkiller 58 · JobDiva 42
1.3 weighted points to DevSkiller
18% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
DevSkiller 22 · JobDiva 15
1.3 weighted points to DevSkiller
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
DevSkiller 40 · JobDiva 30
1.2 weighted points to DevSkiller
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
DevSkiller 25 · JobDiva 22
0.4 weighted points to DevSkiller
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +9.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 28 | +7 | +1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 15 | +7 | +1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 38 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 29 (F) | +10 | +9.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next