§ The result
PageUp leads DevSkiller on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between PageUp (ATS-integrated) and DevSkiller (Assessment): 64 (D) for PageUp, 39 (F) for DevSkiller. PageUp takes all 7 criteria and DevSkiller none of them; the nearest contest is Customer Documentation, DevSkiller 58 to PageUp 63. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (DevSkiller 22, PageUp 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
DevSkiller is filed under Assessment AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only DevSkiller is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | DevSkiller | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | PL | AU |
| Founded | 2014 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
DevSkiller 22 · PageUp 80
10.4 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
DevSkiller 35 · PageUp 74
7.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
DevSkiller 25 · PageUp 40
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
DevSkiller 40 · PageUp 55
1.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
DevSkiller 52 · PageUp 63
1.6 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
DevSkiller 55 · PageUp 64
1.1 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
DevSkiller 58 · PageUp 63
0.4 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -25.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 74 | -39 | -7.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 80 | -58 | -10.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 40 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 63 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 63 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 64 (D) | -25 | -25.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller and PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next