§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads DevSkiller by 17 points.
Workday Recruiting AI finishes 17 points clear of DevSkiller under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 39 — across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Workday Recruiting AI leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while DevSkiller leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring. Workday Recruiting AI takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (DevSkiller 35, Workday Recruiting AI 70), which is 40% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, DevSkiller 22 to Workday Recruiting AI 60.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
DevSkiller is filed under Assessment AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only DevSkiller is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | DevSkiller | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | PL | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
DevSkiller 35 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
7.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
DevSkiller 22 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
6.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
DevSkiller 25 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
DevSkiller 55 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
DevSkiller 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.6 weighted points to DevSkiller
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
DevSkiller 58 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
DevSkiller 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -16.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 70 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 60 | -38 | -6.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 65 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 65 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 56 (F) | -17 | -16.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 26 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.