HomeCompareDice vs Entelo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Dice vs Entelo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Dice leads Entelo on 4 of the 7 criteria.

Within the Sourcing cohort, Dice edges Entelo by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 36 to 33. Entelo is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Dice takes 4, the remaining 3 are level, and the nearest of those 4 is Article 11 Technical Documentation, Dice 32 to Entelo 30. Human Oversight Design is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Dice 55, Entelo 42 — and at a 12% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Dice holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Dice and Entelo are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordDiceEntelo
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19902011

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Dice 55 · Entelo 42

    1.6 weighted points to Dice

  2. 18% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Dice 25 · Entelo 20

    0.9 weighted points to Dice

  3. 8% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Dice 50 · Entelo 40

    0.8 weighted points to Dice

  4. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Dice 32 · Entelo 30

    0.4 weighted points to Dice

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to +3.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Dice minus Entelo.

CategoryWeightDiceEnteloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3230+2+0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2520+5+0.9
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4545--
Human Oversight Design12%5542+13+1.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3535--
Customer Documentation8%5040+10+0.8
Total100%36 (F)33 (F)+3+3.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightDiceEntelo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11—
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—22—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%257Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain98Sources on the vendor's own domain

Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains, and 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Dice last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.