§ The result
HiPeople leads Dice on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between HiPeople (Assessment) and Dice (Sourcing): 61 (D) for HiPeople, 36 (F) for Dice. HiPeople leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Dice leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Dice 25, HiPeople 84) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 42% of the weighted advantage HiPeople holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Dice
Dice is a US job marketplace and resume database for tech roles, run by DHI Group, whose employer tools use a proprietary skills knowledge graph and machine learning (IntelliSearch) to match, score and rank sourced candidates and applicants against job postings.
Vendor profile
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
§ The record
Dice is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HiPeople under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only HiPeople is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Dice | HiPeople |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | DE |
| Founded | 1990 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Dice 25 · HiPeople 84
10.6 weighted points to HiPeople
20% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Dice 32 · HiPeople 62
6.0 weighted points to HiPeople
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Dice 35 · HiPeople 60
3.0 weighted points to HiPeople
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Dice 45 · HiPeople 58
1.9 weighted points to HiPeople
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Dice 25 · HiPeople 35
1.5 weighted points to HiPeople
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Dice 50 · HiPeople 66
1.3 weighted points to HiPeople
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Dice 55 · HiPeople 62
0.8 weighted points to HiPeople
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -25.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Dice minus HiPeople.
| Category | Weight | Dice | HiPeople | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 32 | 62 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 84 | -59 | -10.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 62 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 60 | -25 | -3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 66 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 36 (F) | 61 (D) | -25 | -25.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Dice | HiPeople | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HiPeople has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice and HiPeople sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains, and 31 for HiPeople, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Dice last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiPeople last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next