§ The result
iMocha leads Dice on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, iMocha (Assessment) opens a 20-point lead on Dice (Sourcing), 56 to 36. iMocha leads every one of the 7 criteria, Dice none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Dice 55 to iMocha 64. The advantage iMocha holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Dice 32, iMocha 68, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 37% of the weighted points iMocha gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Dice
Dice is a US job marketplace and resume database for tech roles, run by DHI Group, whose employer tools use a proprietary skills knowledge graph and machine learning (IntelliSearch) to match, score and rank sourced candidates and applicants against job postings.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
§ The record
Dice is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, iMocha under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only iMocha is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Dice | iMocha |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 1990 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Dice 32 · iMocha 68
7.2 weighted points to iMocha
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Dice 25 · iMocha 44
3.4 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Dice 45 · iMocha 66
3.1 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Dice 25 · iMocha 38
1.9 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Dice 35 · iMocha 48
1.6 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Dice 50 · iMocha 66
1.3 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Dice 55 · iMocha 64
1.1 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -19.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Dice minus iMocha.
| Category | Weight | Dice | iMocha | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 32 | 68 | -36 | -7.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 44 | -19 | -3.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 66 | -21 | -3.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 48 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 66 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 36 (F) | 56 (F) | -20 | -19.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Dice | iMocha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice and iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains, and 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Dice last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next