§ The result
HeyMilo leads Dover on all 7 criteria.
HeyMilo finishes 16 points clear of Dover under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 45 (F) — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria, Dover none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, Dover 44 to HeyMilo 46. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Dover 52, HeyMilo 83, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Dover
Dover is an AI recruiting platform for startups offering a free applicant tracking system, candidate sourcing via a LinkedIn/Copilot browser extension, OpenAI/Anthropic-powered 0-100 applicant scoring, and a fractional-recruiter marketplace.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
Dover is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Dover | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Dover 52 · HeyMilo 83
5.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Dover 34 · HeyMilo 58
4.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Dover 30 · HeyMilo 42
1.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Dover 50 · HeyMilo 62
1.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Dover 58 · HeyMilo 64
0.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Dover 60 · HeyMilo 66
0.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Dover 44 · HeyMilo 46
0.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -15.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Dover minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | Dover | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 34 | 58 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 52 | 83 | -31 | -5.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 62 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 46 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 61 (D) | -16 | -15.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Dover | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Dover has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dover and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Dover, across 3 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Dover last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next