§ The result
HeyMilo leads Draup on all 7 criteria.
HeyMilo finishes 19 points clear of Draup under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 42 (F) — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria, Draup none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Draup 58 to HeyMilo 64. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Draup 33, HeyMilo 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Draup
Draup is an AI-powered talent- and sales-intelligence platform that aggregates over a billion public professional profiles into skills, roles and labour-market analytics, and surfaces ranked candidate shortlists for enterprise workforce planning and recruiting.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
Draup is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Draup | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Draup 33 · HeyMilo 83
9.0 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 63% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Draup 25 · HeyMilo 42
2.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Draup 28 · HeyMilo 46
2.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Draup 48 · HeyMilo 58
2.0 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Draup 54 · HeyMilo 62
1.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Draup 58 · HeyMilo 64
0.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Draup 57 · HeyMilo 66
0.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -18.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Draup minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | Draup | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 83 | -50 | -9.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 62 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 46 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 66 | -9 | -0.7 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 61 (D) | -19 | -18.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Draup | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Draup has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Draup and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Draup, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Draup last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next