§ The result
PageUp leads Draup on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, PageUp (ATS-integrated) opens a 22-point lead on Draup (Sourcing), 64 (D) to 42 (F). Draup leads none of the 7 criteria, and PageUp is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. The advantage PageUp holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Draup 33, PageUp 80, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 39% of the weighted points PageUp gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Draup
Draup is an AI-powered talent- and sales-intelligence platform that aggregates over a billion public professional profiles into skills, roles and labour-market analytics, and surfaces ranked candidate shortlists for enterprise workforce planning and recruiting.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
Draup is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Draup | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2017 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Draup 33 · PageUp 80
8.5 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Draup 48 · PageUp 74
5.2 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Draup 28 · PageUp 55
3.2 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Draup 25 · PageUp 40
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Draup 54 · PageUp 63
1.3 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Draup 58 · PageUp 64
0.7 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Draup 57 · PageUp 63
0.5 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Draup minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | Draup | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 74 | -26 | -5.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 80 | -47 | -8.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 40 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 63 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 55 | -27 | -3.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 63 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 64 (D) | -22 | -21.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Draup | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Draup has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Draup and PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Draup, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Draup last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next