HomeCompareEightfold AI vs HireQuotient

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Eightfold AI vs HireQuotient

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Eightfold AI leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.

Eightfold AI and HireQuotient, both Sourcing entries, are 30 points apart under rubric v1.0, 64 (D) for Eightfold AI against 34 (F) for HireQuotient. HireQuotient leads none of the 7 criteria, and Eightfold AI is ahead on 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Eightfold AI 85, HireQuotient 18 — and at an 18% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Eightfold AI and HireQuotient are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: ATS-integrated.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEightfold AIHireQuotient
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSSG
Founded20162021

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Eightfold AI 85 · HireQuotient 18

    12.1 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  2. 20% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Eightfold AI 75 · HireQuotient 35

    8.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  3. 15% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Eightfold AI 45 · HireQuotient 22

    3.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  4. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Eightfold AI 60 · HireQuotient 40

    3.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  5. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Eightfold AI 50 · HireQuotient 30

    2.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  6. 8% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Eightfold AI 60 · HireQuotient 50

    0.8 weighted points to Eightfold AI

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Eightfold AI 60 · HireQuotient 57

    0.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +30.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 30.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +30 beside that +30.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Eightfold AI minus HireQuotient.

CategoryWeightEightfold AIHireQuotientΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7535+40+8.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%8518+67+12.1
FRIA Support15%4522+23+3.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%6040+20+3.0
Human Oversight Design12%6057+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%5030+20+2.4
Customer Documentation8%6050+10+0.8
Total100%64 (D)34 (F)+30+30.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEightfold AIHireQuotient
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%10—60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10—60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%132Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain245Sources on the vendor's own domain

Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Eightfold AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Eightfold AI last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.