§ The result
Eightfold AI leads SEEK by 10 points.
Eightfold AI sits 10 points above SEEK under rubric v1.0 — 64 (D) against 54 (F) — with Eightfold AI filed under Sourcing and SEEK under Screening. The 7 criteria split 3 to 2 in favour of Eightfold AI, with 2 level: Eightfold AI is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and SEEK on Customer Documentation. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Eightfold AI 85, SEEK 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 73% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Eightfold AI
Talent intelligence platform offering candidate matching, internal mobility, and career-site personalization on top of a deep-learning talent graph.
Vendor profile
SEEK
SEEK runs employment marketplaces in Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia (SEEK, Jobstreet and Jobsdb), and its seekAi employer tools label and rank applicants as 'high-fit' using a model trained on millions of past hirer shortlisting decisions, target job ads at predicted high-fit candidates, and run AI voice or text pre-screens, recommended shortlists and reference checks through a feature called Assist.
§ The record
Eightfold AI is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SEEK under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only SEEK is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Eightfold AI | SEEK |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2016 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Eightfold AI 85 · SEEK 40
8.1 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Eightfold AI 45 · SEEK 32
1.9 weighted points to Eightfold AI
20% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Eightfold AI 75 · SEEK 70
1.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Eightfold AI 60 · SEEK 64
0.3 weighted points to SEEK
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Eightfold AI 60 · SEEK 62
0.2 weighted points to SEEK
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +10.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Eightfold AI minus SEEK.
| Category | Weight | Eightfold AI | SEEK | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 75 | 70 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 40 | +45 | +8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 45 | 32 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 54 (F) | +10 | +10.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Eightfold AI | SEEK | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Eightfold AI and SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains, and 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Eightfold AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SEEK last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next