§ The result
3 points separate Emi and HeroHunt.ai.
Emi holds a 3-point edge over HeroHunt.ai under rubric v1.0, 33 to 30, across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. The criteria split evenly, 3 each to Emi and HeroHunt.ai, with 1 level, and the weighted points on the side Emi holds, headed by Article 11 Technical Documentation, settle the total. Emi takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Emi 28, HeroHunt.ai 20), which is 41% of the weighted advantage Emi holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Human Oversight Design, Emi 44 to HeroHunt.ai 55.
Vendor profile
Emi
Emi runs AI agents on WhatsApp, SMS and Messenger that screen and score frontline job applicants against employer-set criteria, schedule interviews, and collect hiring documents and check them against Mexican government databases.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
§ The record
Emi is filed under Screening AI, HeroHunt.ai under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Emi | HeroHunt.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | AR | NL |
| Founded | 2017 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Emi 28 · HeroHunt.ai 20
1.6 weighted points to Emi
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Emi 18 · HeroHunt.ai 10
1.4 weighted points to Emi
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Emi 44 · HeroHunt.ai 55
1.3 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Emi 35 · HeroHunt.ai 28
0.8 weighted points to Emi
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Emi 25 · HeroHunt.ai 27
0.3 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Emi 44 · HeroHunt.ai 45
0.1 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +2.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +2.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Emi minus HeroHunt.ai.
| Category | Weight | Emi | HeroHunt.ai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 20 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 10 | +8 | +1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 45 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 44 | 55 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 28 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 48 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 30 (F) | +3 | +2.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Emi | HeroHunt.ai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Emi has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emi and HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Emi, across 3 distinct source domains, and 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Emi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next