HomeCompareEmmersion vs Fetcher

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Emmersion vs Fetcher

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Emmersion leads Fetcher by 7 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Emmersion, filed under Assessment, finishes on 44 and Fetcher, filed under Sourcing, on 37, 7 points apart. Emmersion leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Fetcher leads 1, including Data Governance Disclosure, and 1 is level. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Emmersion 57, Fetcher 27 — and at a 20% weight it carries 79% of the weighted advantage Emmersion holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Emmersion is filed under Assessment AI, Fetcher under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Emmersion is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEmmersionFetcher
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20152014

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Emmersion 57 · Fetcher 27

    6.0 weighted points to Emmersion

  2. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Emmersion 30 · Fetcher 25

    0.8 weighted points to Emmersion

  3. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Emmersion 50 · Fetcher 55

    0.8 weighted points to Fetcher

  4. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Emmersion 60 · Fetcher 55

    0.4 weighted points to Emmersion

  5. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Emmersion 38 · Fetcher 35

    0.4 weighted points to Emmersion

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Emmersion 53 · Fetcher 52

    0.1 weighted points to Emmersion

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +6.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +6.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Emmersion minus Fetcher.

CategoryWeightEmmersionFetcherΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5727+30+6.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2828--
FRIA Support15%3025+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5055-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5352+1+0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3835+3+0.4
Customer Documentation8%6055+5+0.4
Total100%44 (F)37 (F)+7+6.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEmmersionFetcher
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%355Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain136Sources on the vendor's own domain

Emmersion has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Fetcher has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emmersion sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Emmersion, across 5 distinct source domains, and 19 for Fetcher, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Emmersion last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Fetcher last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.