HomeCompareEmmersion vs hireEZ

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Emmersion vs hireEZ

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate Emmersion and hireEZ.

Emmersion holds a 2-point edge over hireEZ under rubric v1.0, 44 to 42, across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. The criteria split evenly, 3 each to Emmersion and hireEZ, with 1 level, and the weighted points on the side Emmersion holds, headed by Article 11 Technical Documentation, settle the total. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Emmersion 57, hireEZ 38 — and at a 20% weight it carries 81% of the weighted advantage Emmersion holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Emmersion is filed under Assessment AI, hireEZ under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Emmersion is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEmmersionhireEZ
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20152015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 53% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Emmersion 57 · hireEZ 38

    3.8 weighted points to Emmersion

  2. 15% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Emmersion 50 · hireEZ 60

    1.5 weighted points to hireEZ

  3. 15% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Emmersion 30 · hireEZ 25

    0.8 weighted points to Emmersion

  4. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Emmersion 53 · hireEZ 58

    0.6 weighted points to hireEZ

  5. 18% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Emmersion 28 · hireEZ 30

    0.4 weighted points to hireEZ

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Emmersion 60 · hireEZ 58

    0.2 weighted points to Emmersion

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +2.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +2.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Emmersion minus hireEZ.

CategoryWeightEmmersionhireEZΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5738+19+3.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%2830-2-0.4
FRIA Support15%3025+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5060-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5358-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3838--
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%44 (F)42 (F)+2+2.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEmmersionhireEZ
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%355Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain95Sources on the vendor's own domain

Emmersion has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; hireEZ has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emmersion sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Emmersion, across 5 distinct source domains, and 14 for hireEZ, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Emmersion last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
hireEZ last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.