HomeCompareEmmersion vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Emmersion vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Emmersion on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter sits 13 points above Emmersion under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 44 — with LinkedIn Recruiter filed under Sourcing and Emmersion under Assessment. Of the 7 criteria Emmersion wins none, and the narrowest lead LinkedIn Recruiter holds is on FRIA Support, Emmersion 30 to LinkedIn Recruiter 38. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Emmersion 28, LinkedIn Recruiter 50, 18% weight), is only 31% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Emmersion is filed under Assessment AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Emmersion is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEmmersionLinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20152002

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Emmersion 28 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    4.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 20% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Emmersion 57 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67

    2.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 15% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Emmersion 50 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62

    1.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 12% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Emmersion 53 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66

    1.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Emmersion 38 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    1.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Emmersion 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Emmersion 60 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68

    0.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Emmersion minus LinkedIn Recruiter.

CategoryWeightEmmersionLinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5767-10-2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2850-22-4.0
FRIA Support15%3038-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%5062-12-1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5366-13-1.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3850-12-1.4
Customer Documentation8%6068-8-0.6
Total100%44 (F)57 (F)-13-12.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEmmersionLinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%355Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Emmersion has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emmersion and LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 79 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Emmersion, across 5 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Emmersion last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.