HomeCompareEmmersion vs Pinpoint

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Emmersion vs Pinpoint

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Pinpoint leads Emmersion on all 7 criteria.

Pinpoint, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 13 points above Emmersion, filed under Assessment: 57 against 44 under rubric v1.0. Pinpoint takes all 7 criteria from Emmersion without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Customer Documentation, Emmersion 60 to Pinpoint 66. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Data Governance Disclosure (Emmersion 50, Pinpoint 68) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Emmersion 57, Pinpoint 72), the second being 23% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Emmersion is filed under Assessment AI, Pinpoint under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Emmersion is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEmmersionPinpoint
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSJE
Founded20152017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 23% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Emmersion 57 · Pinpoint 72

    3.0 weighted points to Pinpoint

  2. 15% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Emmersion 50 · Pinpoint 68

    2.7 weighted points to Pinpoint

  3. 18% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Emmersion 28 · Pinpoint 42

    2.5 weighted points to Pinpoint

  4. 12% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Emmersion 38 · Pinpoint 52

    1.7 weighted points to Pinpoint

  5. 12% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Emmersion 53 · Pinpoint 64

    1.3 weighted points to Pinpoint

  6. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Emmersion 30 · Pinpoint 38

    1.2 weighted points to Pinpoint

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Emmersion 60 · Pinpoint 66

    0.5 weighted points to Pinpoint

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Emmersion minus Pinpoint.

CategoryWeightEmmersionPinpointΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5772-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2842-14-2.5
FRIA Support15%3038-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%5068-18-2.7
Human Oversight Design12%5364-11-1.3
Post-Market Monitoring12%3852-14-1.7
Customer Documentation8%6066-6-0.5
Total100%44 (F)57 (F)-13-12.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEmmersionPinpoint
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%355Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain182Sources on the vendor's own domain

Emmersion has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emmersion sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Emmersion, across 5 distinct source domains, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Emmersion last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pinpoint last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.