HomeCompareEmmersion vs SmartRecruiters

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Emmersion vs SmartRecruiters

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SmartRecruiters leads Emmersion on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, SmartRecruiters (ATS-integrated) opens an 18-point lead on Emmersion (Assessment), 62 (D) to 44 (F). Of the 7 criteria Emmersion wins none, and the narrowest lead SmartRecruiters holds is on Customer Documentation, Emmersion 60 to SmartRecruiters 63. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Emmersion 28, SmartRecruiters 78 — and at an 18% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Emmersion is filed under Assessment AI, SmartRecruiters under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Emmersion is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEmmersionSmartRecruiters
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20152010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Emmersion 28 · SmartRecruiters 78

    9.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. 20% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Emmersion 57 · SmartRecruiters 70

    2.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. 15% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Emmersion 30 · SmartRecruiters 45

    2.3 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Emmersion 50 · SmartRecruiters 62

    1.8 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Emmersion 38 · SmartRecruiters 48

    1.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Emmersion 53 · SmartRecruiters 62

    1.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Emmersion 60 · SmartRecruiters 63

    0.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -18.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Emmersion minus SmartRecruiters.

CategoryWeightEmmersionSmartRecruitersΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5770-13-2.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2878-50-9.0
FRIA Support15%3045-15-2.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5062-12-1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5362-9-1.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3848-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%6063-3-0.2
Total100%44 (F)62 (D)-18-18.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEmmersionSmartRecruiters
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%355Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Emmersion has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emmersion and SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Emmersion, across 5 distinct source domains, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Emmersion last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.