HomeCompareEmmersion vs Tribepad

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Emmersion vs Tribepad

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Tribepad leads Emmersion by 12 points.

Tribepad, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 12 points above Emmersion, filed under Assessment: 56 against 44 under rubric v1.0. Emmersion takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 4 for Tribepad, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Emmersion 28, Tribepad 78 — and at an 18% weight it carries 72% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Emmersion is filed under Assessment AI, Tribepad under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Emmersion is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEmmersionTribepad
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20152008

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Emmersion 28 · Tribepad 78

    9.0 weighted points to Tribepad

  2. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Emmersion 38 · Tribepad 54

    1.9 weighted points to Tribepad

  3. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Emmersion 50 · Tribepad 56

    0.9 weighted points to Tribepad

  4. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Emmersion 53 · Tribepad 58

    0.6 weighted points to Tribepad

  5. 20% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Emmersion 57 · Tribepad 56

    0.2 weighted points to Emmersion

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Emmersion 60 · Tribepad 58

    0.2 weighted points to Emmersion

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -12.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -12.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Emmersion minus Tribepad.

CategoryWeightEmmersionTribepadΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5756+1+0.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2878-50-9.0
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5056-6-0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5358-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3854-16-1.9
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%44 (F)56 (F)-12-12.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEmmersionTribepad
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain40Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%355Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain284Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Emmersion has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emmersion and Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Emmersion, across 5 distinct source domains, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Emmersion last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tribepad last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.