§ The result
Enhancv leads LoopCV by 18 points.
Enhancv finishes 18 points clear of LoopCV under rubric js-v1.0 — 68 (D) against 50 (F) — across the Resume AI and Auto-apply cohorts. Enhancv leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Employer & ATS Legitimacy, while LoopCV leads 1, including Pricing & Cancellation Fairness. Employer & ATS Legitimacy is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Enhancv 78, LoopCV 38, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Enhancv holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
Vendor profile
LoopCV
LoopCV is a job-search automation platform that continuously matches a job seeker's CV to postings across 30+ job boards and applies on their behalf via ATS form-fills, LinkedIn Easy Apply, and templated emails to recruiters.
§ The record
Enhancv is filed under Resume & profile AI, LoopCV under Auto-apply tools. They also share 2 secondary categories: Tracker and Job matching.
| Record | Enhancv | LoopCV |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | BG | GR |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Enhancv 78 · LoopCV 38
6.0 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Enhancv 60 · LoopCV 40
4.0 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Enhancv 80 · LoopCV 60
3.0 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Enhancv 68 · LoopCV 55
2.6 weighted points to Enhancv
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Enhancv 52 · LoopCV 35
2.0 weighted points to Enhancv
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Enhancv 72 · LoopCV 68
0.3 weighted points to Enhancv
10% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Enhancv 62 · LoopCV 65
0.3 weighted points to LoopCV
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +18 beside that +17.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Enhancv minus LoopCV.
| Category | Weight | Enhancv | LoopCV | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 55 | +13 | +2.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +4.0 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 80 | 60 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 78 | 38 | +40 | +6.0 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 52 | 35 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 65 | -3 | -0.3 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 72 | 68 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 68 (D) | 50 (F) | +18 | +17.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Enhancv | LoopCV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; LoopCV has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LoopCV sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for LoopCV, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LoopCV last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against