§ The result
Enhancv leads Rezi on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Enhancv scores 68 (D) and Rezi 59 (F) under rubric js-v1.0 — a 9-point gap inside the Resume AI cohort. Enhancv leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Rezi is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Enhancv leads is Data & Credential Safety, Enhancv 60 to Rezi 58. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Effectiveness Evidence (Enhancv 52, Rezi 32) and Application Honesty at 20% (Enhancv 68, Rezi 55), the second being 30% of the weighted advantage Enhancv holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
Vendor profile
Rezi
Rezi is an AI resume builder that drafts and rewrites resume bullet points, summaries and cover letters, scores drafts against ATS formatting conventions with a 0-100 "Rezi Score", and adds a Chrome extension that autofills job applications on Workday, Greenhouse and Lever for the user to submit.
§ The record
Enhancv and Rezi are both filed under Resume & profile AI. They also share 3 secondary categories: Tracker, Job matching and Career coaching.
| Record | Enhancv | Rezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | BG | KR |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Enhancv 68 · Rezi 55
2.6 weighted points to Enhancv
12% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Enhancv 52 · Rezi 32
2.4 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Enhancv 80 · Rezi 70
1.5 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Enhancv 78 · Rezi 68
1.5 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Enhancv 60 · Rezi 58
0.4 weighted points to Enhancv
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Enhancv 72 · Rezi 70
0.2 weighted points to Enhancv
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +8.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +8.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Enhancv minus Rezi.
| Category | Weight | Enhancv | Rezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 55 | +13 | +2.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.4 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 80 | 70 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 78 | 68 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 52 | 32 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 62 | - | - |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 72 | 70 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 68 (D) | 59 (F) | +9 | +8.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Enhancv | Rezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 27 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Rezi has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Rezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains, and 34 for Rezi, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Rezi last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
Scored against