§ The result
Harri leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.
Harri scores 41 and Entelo 33 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Harri leads every one of the 7 criteria, Entelo none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, Entelo 20 to Harri 22. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Entelo 40, Harri 60) and FRIA Support at 15% (Entelo 25, Harri 44), the second being 33% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Vendor profile
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
§ The record
Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Harri under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Entelo | Harri |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 33% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Entelo 25 · Harri 44
2.9 weighted points to Harri
8% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Entelo 40 · Harri 60
1.6 weighted points to Harri
12% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Entelo 42 · Harri 52
1.2 weighted points to Harri
15% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Entelo 45 · Harri 52
1.1 weighted points to Harri
20% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Entelo 30 · Harri 35
1.0 weighted points to Harri
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Entelo 35 · Harri 40
0.6 weighted points to Harri
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Entelo 20 · Harri 22
0.4 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus Harri.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | Harri | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 22 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 44 | -19 | -2.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 41 (F) | -8 | -8.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | Harri | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next