§ The result
JazzHR leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.
JazzHR sits 11 points above Entelo under rubric v1.0 — 44 against 33 — with JazzHR filed under ATS-integrated and Entelo under Sourcing. JazzHR is ahead of Entelo on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at Entelo 25 to JazzHR 28. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Human Oversight Design (Entelo 42, JazzHR 58) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Entelo 30, JazzHR 45), the second being 27% of the weighted advantage JazzHR holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Vendor profile
JazzHR
JazzHR is a small-business applicant tracking system that manages job posting, applications and hiring workflows, and layers on AI "Talent Fit" scoring that ranks candidates against a job description plus automated knockout screening questions.
§ The record
Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, JazzHR under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Entelo | JazzHR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Entelo 30 · JazzHR 45
3.0 weighted points to JazzHR
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Entelo 20 · JazzHR 35
2.7 weighted points to JazzHR
12% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Entelo 42 · JazzHR 58
1.9 weighted points to JazzHR
8% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Entelo 40 · JazzHR 56
1.3 weighted points to JazzHR
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Entelo 45 · JazzHR 52
1.1 weighted points to JazzHR
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Entelo 35 · JazzHR 42
0.8 weighted points to JazzHR
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Entelo 25 · JazzHR 28
0.4 weighted points to JazzHR
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus JazzHR.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | JazzHR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 35 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 56 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 44 (F) | -11 | -11.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | JazzHR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 17 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; JazzHR has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for JazzHR sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 40 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 24 for JazzHR, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JazzHR last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next