§ The result
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) finishes 24 points clear of Entelo inside the Sourcing cohort under rubric v1.0: 57 against 33. Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Entelo leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Entelo 20, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84 — and at an 18% weight it carries 48% of the weighted advantage Juicebox (PeopleGPT) holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Vendor profile
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
§ The record
Entelo and Juicebox (PeopleGPT) are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: ATS-integrated and Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Entelo | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Entelo 20 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84
11.5 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
20% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Entelo 30 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 52
4.4 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Entelo 35 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 55
2.4 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Entelo 45 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 56
1.6 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Entelo 40 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 60
1.6 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Entelo 25 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 35
1.5 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Entelo 42 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 50
1.0 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -24.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -24 beside that -24.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus Juicebox (PeopleGPT).
| Category | Weight | Entelo | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 84 | -64 | -11.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 56 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 50 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 55 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 57 (F) | -24 | -24.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Juicebox (PeopleGPT) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next