HomeCompareEntelo vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Entelo vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, LinkedIn Recruiter opens a 24-point lead on Entelo, 57 to 33, with both scored in the Sourcing cohort. LinkedIn Recruiter leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Entelo leads none. The advantage LinkedIn Recruiter holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Entelo 30, LinkedIn Recruiter 67, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 31% of the weighted points LinkedIn Recruiter gains across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Entelo and LinkedIn Recruiter are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordEnteloLinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20112002

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Entelo 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67

    7.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 18% weight · 53% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Entelo 20 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    5.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 12% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Entelo 42 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66

    2.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Entelo 45 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62

    2.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 8% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Entelo 40 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68

    2.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Entelo 25 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38

    1.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Entelo 35 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    1.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -24.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -24 beside that -24.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Entelo minus LinkedIn Recruiter.

CategoryWeightEnteloLinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3067-37-7.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2050-30-5.4
FRIA Support15%2538-13-1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%4562-17-2.5
Human Oversight Design12%4266-24-2.9
Post-Market Monitoring12%3550-15-1.8
Customer Documentation8%4068-28-2.2
Total100%33 (F)57 (F)-24-24.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEnteloLinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11—41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%22—41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%01—31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%11—60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%98Sources on the vendor's own domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.