HomeCompareEntelo vs Loxo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Entelo vs Loxo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Loxo leads Entelo on 5 of the 7 criteria.

Within the Sourcing cohort, Loxo edges Entelo by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 37 to 33. Loxo leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Entelo is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Loxo leads is FRIA Support, Entelo 25 to Loxo 30. Customer Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Entelo 40, Loxo 58, 8% weight), but it accounts for only 32% of the weighted advantage Loxo holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Entelo and Loxo are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: ATS-integrated.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Entelo is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordEnteloLoxo
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20112012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 8% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Entelo 40 · Loxo 58

    1.4 weighted points to Loxo

  2. 12% weight · 53% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Entelo 42 · Loxo 50

    1.0 weighted points to Loxo

  3. 15% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Entelo 25 · Loxo 30

    0.8 weighted points to Loxo

  4. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Entelo 45 · Loxo 50

    0.8 weighted points to Loxo

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Entelo 35 · Loxo 40

    0.6 weighted points to Loxo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -4.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Entelo minus Loxo.

CategoryWeightEnteloLoxoΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3030--
Bias Audit Transparency18%2020--
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4550-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%4250-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3540-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%4058-18-1.4
Total100%33 (F)37 (F)-4-4.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEnteloLoxo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%1121Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%2211
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%1111
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%98Sources on the vendor's own domain127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Loxo last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.