§ The result
3 points separate Entelo and Moonhub.
Within the Sourcing cohort, Entelo edges Moonhub by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 33 to 30. Entelo leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Post-Market Monitoring, while Moonhub leads 1, including Human Oversight Design, and 2 are level. Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Entelo 35, Moonhub 22 — and at a 12% weight it carries 55% of the weighted advantage Entelo holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
§ The record
Entelo and Moonhub are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Entelo | Moonhub |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Entelo 35 · Moonhub 22
1.6 weighted points to Entelo
15% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Entelo 45 · Moonhub 40
0.8 weighted points to Entelo
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Entelo 42 · Moonhub 48
0.7 weighted points to Moonhub
18% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Entelo 20 · Moonhub 18
0.4 weighted points to Entelo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Entelo 40 · Moonhub 38
0.2 weighted points to Entelo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +2.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +2.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus Moonhub.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | Moonhub | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 18 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 48 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 30 (F) | +3 | +2.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | Moonhub | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next