HomeCompareEntelo vs Pin

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Entelo vs Pin

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Pin leads Entelo on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Pin finishes 7 points ahead of Entelo under rubric v1.0, 40 to 33, both scored as Sourcing entries. Entelo is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Pin takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is FRIA Support, Entelo 25 to Pin 30. The advantage Pin holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Entelo 20, Pin 35, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points Pin gains across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Entelo and Pin are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordEnteloPin
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20112024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Entelo 20 · Pin 35

    2.7 weighted points to Pin

  2. 12% weight · 52% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Entelo 35 · Pin 45

    1.2 weighted points to Pin

  3. 8% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Entelo 40 · Pin 55

    1.2 weighted points to Pin

  4. 12% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Entelo 42 · Pin 50

    1.0 weighted points to Pin

  5. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Entelo 25 · Pin 30

    0.8 weighted points to Pin

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Entelo 45 · Pin 50

    0.8 weighted points to Pin

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -7.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -7.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Entelo minus Pin.

CategoryWeightEnteloPinΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3030--
Bias Audit Transparency18%2035-15-2.7
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4550-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%4250-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3545-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%4055-15-1.2
Total100%33 (F)40 (F)-7-7.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEnteloPin
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%22—31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%01—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11—60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%98Sources on the vendor's own domain325Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Pin has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 37 for Pin, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pin last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.