§ The result
3 points separate Recruiterflow and Entelo.
Recruiterflow holds a 3-point edge over Entelo under rubric v1.0, 36 to 33, across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Entelo takes 3 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 4 for Recruiterflow, whose share includes Human Oversight Design. Human Oversight Design is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Entelo 42, Recruiterflow 58 — and at a 12% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Recruiterflow holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Vendor profile
Recruiterflow
Recruiterflow is an ATS and CRM for recruiting agencies and executive search firms. Its AIRA AI layer ranks candidates already in a firm's database against each job with an explainable 0–100 Criteria Score (AIRA Matchmaker, shown as the 'AI Matches' card), and adds natural-language candidate search, external profile sourcing and an AI call notetaker that fills in interview scorecards.
§ The record
Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Recruiterflow under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Entelo is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Entelo | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Entelo 42 · Recruiterflow 58
1.9 weighted points to Recruiterflow
8% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Entelo 40 · Recruiterflow 56
1.3 weighted points to Recruiterflow
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Entelo 25 · Recruiterflow 30
0.8 weighted points to Recruiterflow
20% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Entelo 30 · Recruiterflow 33
0.6 weighted points to Recruiterflow
18% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Entelo 20 · Recruiterflow 18
0.4 weighted points to Entelo
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Entelo 35 · Recruiterflow 33
0.2 weighted points to Entelo
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Entelo 45 · Recruiterflow 44
0.1 weighted points to Entelo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus Recruiterflow.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | Recruiterflow | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 33 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 18 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 44 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 33 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 56 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 36 (F) | -3 | -3.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | Recruiterflow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Recruiterflow has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for Recruiterflow, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruiterflow last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next