HomeCompareEntelo vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Entelo vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting finishes 20 points clear of Entelo under rubric v1.0 — 53 against 33 — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Entelo leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Entelo 30, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordEnteloSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded20111972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Entelo 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    8.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 18% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Entelo 20 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    3.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 12% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Entelo 42 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    2.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Entelo 45 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    2.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 8% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Entelo 40 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    1.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Entelo 25 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    1.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Entelo 35 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -20.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Entelo minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightEnteloSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3070-40-8.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2040-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4560-15-2.3
Human Oversight Design12%4262-20-2.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3540-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%4062-22-1.8
Total100%33 (F)53 (F)-20-20.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEnteloSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%1141Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%2221Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%1130Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%98Sources on the vendor's own domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.