HomeCompareEntelo vs SEEK

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Entelo vs SEEK

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SEEK leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.

SEEK finishes 21 points clear of Entelo under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 33 — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. SEEK leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Entelo leads none. The advantage SEEK holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Entelo 30, SEEK 70, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points SEEK gains across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SEEK under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordEnteloSEEK
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSAU
Founded20111997

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 38% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Entelo 30 · SEEK 70

    8.0 weighted points to SEEK

  2. 18% weight · 55% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Entelo 20 · SEEK 40

    3.6 weighted points to SEEK

  3. 12% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Entelo 42 · SEEK 62

    2.4 weighted points to SEEK

  4. 15% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Entelo 45 · SEEK 60

    2.3 weighted points to SEEK

  5. 8% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Entelo 40 · SEEK 64

    1.9 weighted points to SEEK

  6. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Entelo 35 · SEEK 50

    1.8 weighted points to SEEK

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Entelo 25 · SEEK 32

    1.1 weighted points to SEEK

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -21.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Entelo minus SEEK.

CategoryWeightEnteloSEEKΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3070-40-8.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2040-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%2532-7-1.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%4560-15-2.3
Human Oversight Design12%4262-20-2.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3550-15-1.8
Customer Documentation8%4064-24-1.9
Total100%33 (F)54 (F)-21-21.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEnteloSEEK
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11—41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%22—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%01—11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11—51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%98Sources on the vendor's own domain237Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SEEK last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.