§ The result
Equalture leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Equalture finishes 15 points clear of JobDiva under rubric v1.0 — 44 against 29 — across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Equalture leads every one of the 7 criteria, JobDiva none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, Equalture 30 to JobDiva 22. The advantage Equalture holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Equalture 40, JobDiva 15, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 30% of the weighted points Equalture gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Equalture
Equalture is a game-based pre-employment assessment platform whose short browser games measure candidates' cognitive abilities and behavioural tendencies and convert them into a Fit Score ranked against an employer-specific "Success Profile" derived from that employer's own top performers.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Equalture is filed under Assessment AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Equalture is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Equalture | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Equalture 40 · JobDiva 15
4.5 weighted points to Equalture
20% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Equalture 45 · JobDiva 28
3.4 weighted points to Equalture
15% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Equalture 55 · JobDiva 38
2.5 weighted points to Equalture
8% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Equalture 60 · JobDiva 42
1.4 weighted points to Equalture
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Equalture 30 · JobDiva 22
1.2 weighted points to Equalture
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Equalture 50 · JobDiva 40
1.2 weighted points to Equalture
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Equalture 38 · JobDiva 30
1.0 weighted points to Equalture
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +15.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Equalture minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Equalture | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 28 | +17 | +3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 15 | +25 | +4.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 22 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 38 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 40 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 29 (F) | +15 | +15.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Equalture | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Equalture has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Equalture, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Equalture last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next