§ The result
Pinpoint leads Equalture on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint sits 13 points above Equalture under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 44 — with Pinpoint filed under ATS-integrated and Equalture under Assessment. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria, Equalture none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, Equalture 40 to Pinpoint 42. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Equalture 45, Pinpoint 72 — and at a 20% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Equalture
Equalture is a game-based pre-employment assessment platform whose short browser games measure candidates' cognitive abilities and behavioural tendencies and convert them into a Fit Score ranked against an employer-specific "Success Profile" derived from that employer's own top performers.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
Equalture is filed under Assessment AI, Pinpoint under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Equalture is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Equalture | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | JE |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Equalture 45 · Pinpoint 72
5.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Equalture 55 · Pinpoint 68
1.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Equalture 50 · Pinpoint 64
1.7 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Equalture 38 · Pinpoint 52
1.7 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Equalture 30 · Pinpoint 38
1.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Equalture 60 · Pinpoint 66
0.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Equalture 40 · Pinpoint 42
0.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Equalture minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Equalture | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 72 | -27 | -5.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 68 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 64 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 57 (F) | -13 | -12.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Equalture | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Equalture has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Equalture, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Equalture last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next