§ The result
Equalture leads SeekOut on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Equalture sits 10 points above SeekOut under rubric v1.0 — 44 against 34 — with Equalture filed under Assessment and SeekOut under Sourcing. Equalture leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so SeekOut is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Equalture leads is FRIA Support, Equalture 30 to SeekOut 25. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Equalture 60, SeekOut 35) and Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (Equalture 55, SeekOut 35), the second being 30% of the weighted advantage Equalture holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Equalture
Equalture is a game-based pre-employment assessment platform whose short browser games measure candidates' cognitive abilities and behavioural tendencies and convert them into a Fit Score ranked against an employer-specific "Success Profile" derived from that employer's own top performers.
Vendor profile
SeekOut
Sourcing platform aggregating public profile data into a searchable talent index, with AI-assisted candidate matching and outreach.
§ The record
Equalture is filed under Assessment AI, SeekOut under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Equalture is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Equalture | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Equalture 55 · SeekOut 35
3.0 weighted points to Equalture
20% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Equalture 45 · SeekOut 35
2.0 weighted points to Equalture
8% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Equalture 60 · SeekOut 35
2.0 weighted points to Equalture
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Equalture 38 · SeekOut 25
1.6 weighted points to Equalture
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Equalture 30 · SeekOut 25
0.8 weighted points to Equalture
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Equalture 50 · SeekOut 45
0.6 weighted points to Equalture
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +9.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +9.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Equalture minus SeekOut.
| Category | Weight | Equalture | SeekOut | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 35 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 40 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 35 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 45 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 25 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 35 | +25 | +2.0 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 34 (F) | +10 | +9.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Equalture | SeekOut | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Equalture has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Equalture, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Equalture last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SeekOut last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next