§ The result
eSkill leads Turing by 5 points.
eSkill finishes 5 points ahead of Turing under rubric v1.0, 41 to 36, both scored as Assessment entries. Turing takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for eSkill, whose share includes Human Oversight Design. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (eSkill 57, Turing 45, 12% weight), but it accounts for only 26% of the weighted advantage eSkill holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
eSkill
eSkill is a pre-employment testing platform with auto-scored skills, cognitive and behavioral tests and human-rated one-way video interviews, plus an optional Proctorio-powered AI proctoring add-on that gives each candidate a suspicion score and a Claude-based "Linea" layer that drafts assessments from job descriptions.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
eSkill and Turing are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | eSkill | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
eSkill 57 · Turing 45
1.4 weighted points to eSkill
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
eSkill 48 · Turing 42
1.2 weighted points to eSkill
12% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
eSkill 36 · Turing 27
1.1 weighted points to eSkill
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
eSkill 30 · Turing 25
0.8 weighted points to eSkill
8% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
eSkill 56 · Turing 48
0.6 weighted points to eSkill
18% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
eSkill 25 · Turing 28
0.5 weighted points to Turing
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
eSkill 47 · Turing 44
0.4 weighted points to eSkill
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +5.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is eSkill minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | eSkill | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 42 | +6 | +1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 47 | 44 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 45 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 36 | 27 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 48 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 36 (F) | +5 | +5.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | eSkill | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
eSkill has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for eSkill sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for eSkill, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- eSkill last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next