§ The result
HeyMilo leads Feenyx on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, HeyMilo (Screening) opens a 21-point lead on Feenyx (Assessment), 61 (D) to 40 (F). HeyMilo takes all 7 criteria and Feenyx none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, Feenyx 58 to HeyMilo 64. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Feenyx 25, HeyMilo 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Feenyx
Feenyx (formerly Filtered.ai) is a skills-assessment and interview platform that runs AI-scored asynchronous coding, video and written assessments and AI-assisted live interviews, with resume scoring, candidate matching, identity verification and fraud/AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
Feenyx is filed under Assessment AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Feenyx | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2016 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Feenyx 25 · HeyMilo 83
10.4 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Feenyx 42 · HeyMilo 58
3.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Feenyx 25 · HeyMilo 42
2.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Feenyx 50 · HeyMilo 62
1.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Feenyx 38 · HeyMilo 46
1.0 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Feenyx 55 · HeyMilo 66
0.9 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Feenyx 58 · HeyMilo 64
0.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -20.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Feenyx minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | Feenyx | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 83 | -58 | -10.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 62 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 46 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 66 | -11 | -0.9 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 61 (D) | -21 | -20.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Feenyx | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Feenyx has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Feenyx and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Feenyx, across 3 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Feenyx last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next