§ The result
Feenyx leads Mercor on all 7 criteria.
Feenyx finishes 17 points clear of Mercor under rubric v1.0 — 40 against 23 — across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. Feenyx leads every one of the 7 criteria, Mercor none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, Feenyx 25 to Mercor 20. The advantage Feenyx holds is spread out: Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Feenyx 50, Mercor 22, 15% weight), yet it supplies only 25% of the weighted points Feenyx gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Feenyx
Feenyx (formerly Filtered.ai) is a skills-assessment and interview platform that runs AI-scored asynchronous coding, video and written assessments and AI-assisted live interviews, with resume scoring, candidate matching, identity verification and fraud/AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
Mercor
Mercor is an AI talent platform that runs automated 20-minute AI video interviews and semantic resume/profile matching to vet, score, and place candidates and expert contractors, and offers an enterprise applicant-screening product that scores employers' applicant pools against role rubrics with pass/fail recommendations.
§ The record
Feenyx is filed under Assessment AI, Mercor under Screening AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Video interview and Sourcing.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Feenyx | Mercor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2016 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 25% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Feenyx 50 · Mercor 22
4.2 weighted points to Feenyx
20% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Feenyx 42 · Mercor 22
4.0 weighted points to Feenyx
18% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Feenyx 25 · Mercor 10
2.7 weighted points to Feenyx
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Feenyx 38 · Mercor 20
2.2 weighted points to Feenyx
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Feenyx 58 · Mercor 42
1.9 weighted points to Feenyx
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Feenyx 55 · Mercor 40
1.2 weighted points to Feenyx
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Feenyx 25 · Mercor 20
0.8 weighted points to Feenyx
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +16.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Feenyx minus Mercor.
| Category | Weight | Feenyx | Mercor | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 22 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 10 | +15 | +2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 20 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 22 | +28 | +4.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 20 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 23 (F) | +17 | +16.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Feenyx | Mercor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Feenyx has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Mercor has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Feenyx sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Feenyx, across 3 distinct source domains, and 16 for Mercor, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Feenyx last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Mercor last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next