Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Fetcher vs HiPeople
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Fetcher
AI-powered candidate sourcing and outbound recruiting platform that automates passive and active talent sourcing, personalized email outreach, and inbound applicant screening for corporate recruiting teams.
Vendor profile
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Fetcher minus HiPeople.
| Category | Weight | Fetcher | HiPeople | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 27 | 62 | -35 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 84 | -56 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 58 | -3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 62 | -10 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 60 | -25 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 66 | -11 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 61 (D) | -24 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Fetcher
19 rows across 7 categories
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 3
- documentation
- 10
Evidence count
HiPeople
31 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 16
- public statement
- 2
- absence
- 8
- audit report
- 5