Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Findem vs Paradox
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Findem
AI talent-intelligence platform that uses 'attribute'/3D-data enrichment over 850M+ candidate profiles to power candidate search, sourcing, talent CRM, and agentic recruiting workflows.
58
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
41
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Findem minus Paradox.
| Category | Weight | Findem | Paradox | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 40 | +18 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 50 | +33 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 25 | +13 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 45 | +12 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 50 | +10 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 35 | +7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 45 | +13 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 41 (F) | +17 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Findem
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 7
- absence
- 5
- audit report
- 2
- public statement
- 3
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2