Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Fountain vs UKG
Fountain
AI-powered high-volume hiring platform that automates sourcing, applicant screening (including a voice-based AI Recruiter), interview scheduling, and onboarding for frontline workforces.
Substantial gaps
Screening
UKG
UKG is an enterprise HCM and workforce-management suite whose UKG Pro Recruiting applicant-tracking module, augmented by the embedded Bryte AI layer, drafts job descriptions and produces profile-match candidate scores to rank and shortlist applicants.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Fountain and UKG tie at 44.
Fountain (Screening) and UKG (ATS-integrated) tie at 44 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Fountain leads 3 of the 7 criteria and UKG 3, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. FRIA Support, at 15%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to UKG (Fountain 30, UKG 35), 66% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Human Oversight Design, Fountain 58 to UKG 52.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Fountain3
- UKG3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design58 vs 52
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Fountain is filed under Screening AI, UKG under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Fountain | UKG |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight30% of the movement so far
Fountain30UKG350.8 weighted points to UKG
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight59% of the movement so far
Fountain58UKG520.7 weighted points to Fountain
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight75% of the movement so far
Fountain50UKG480.4 weighted points to Fountain
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight84% of the movement so far
Fountain40UKG380.2 weighted points to Fountain
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight94% of the movement so far
Fountain52UKG550.2 weighted points to UKG
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Fountain55UKG560.1 weighted points to UKG
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Fountain minus UKG, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Fountain | UKG | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 48 | +2 | +0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 56 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 44F | 44F | - | +0.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Fountain | UKG | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 2 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Fountain has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; UKG has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Fountain, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for UKG, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Fountain last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- UKG last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.