HomeCompareFuel50 vs Interviewer.AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Fuel50 vs Interviewer.AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Fuel50 leads Interviewer.AI by 11 points.

Fuel50, filed under Sourcing, comes out 11 points above Interviewer.AI, filed under Video interview: 58 against 47 under rubric v1.0. Fuel50 leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Interviewer.AI leads 1, including FRIA Support. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Fuel50 68, Interviewer.AI 35 — and at an 18% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage Fuel50 holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Fuel50 is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Interviewer.AI under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordFuel50Interviewer.AI
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSSG
Founded20112018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Fuel50 68 · Interviewer.AI 35

    5.9 weighted points to Fuel50

  2. 20% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Fuel50 70 · Interviewer.AI 52

    3.6 weighted points to Fuel50

  3. 12% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Fuel50 40 · Interviewer.AI 32

    1.0 weighted points to Fuel50

  4. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Fuel50 64 · Interviewer.AI 60

    0.6 weighted points to Fuel50

  5. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Fuel50 32 · Interviewer.AI 35

    0.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI

  6. 8% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Fuel50 62 · Interviewer.AI 58

    0.3 weighted points to Fuel50

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Fuel50 61 · Interviewer.AI 60

    0.1 weighted points to Fuel50

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Fuel50 minus Interviewer.AI.

CategoryWeightFuel50Interviewer.AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7052+18+3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%6835+33+5.9
FRIA Support15%3235-3-0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%6460+4+0.6
Human Oversight Design12%6160+1+0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%4032+8+1.0
Customer Documentation8%6258+4+0.3
Total100%58 (F)47 (F)+11+11.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightFuel50Interviewer.AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21—11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%40Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%244Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain126Sources on the vendor's own domain

Fuel50 has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Fuel50 sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for Fuel50, across 3 distinct source domains, and 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Fuel50 last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Interviewer.AI last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.