Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Glider AI vs Hogan Assessments

Export comparison (CSV)ProBuild another comparison
Vendor profile

Glider AI

Leads by 5

Glider AI is a skills-validation platform that screens and verifies candidates with auto-scored skills assessments and coding simulations, autonomous AI video and voice interviews that score responses against job requirements, live coding interviews, AI proctoring, and biometric ID verification.

52/ 100
F

Substantial gaps

Assessment

View profile
Vendor profile

Hogan Assessments

Hogan Assessments provides science-based personality assessments - chiefly the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS), and Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI) - used to predict workplace performance for employee selection and development.

47/ 100
F

Substantial gaps

Assessment

View profile

The result

Glider AI leads Hogan Assessments by 5 points.

Glider AI finishes 5 points ahead of Hogan Assessments under rubric v1.0, 52 to 47, both scored as Assessment entries. Glider AI leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Hogan Assessments leads 2, including Customer Documentation, and 1 is level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Glider AI 68, Hogan Assessments 44) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 80% of the weighted advantage Glider AI holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Glider AI4
  • Hogan Assessments2
  • Level1
Widest raw gap
Bias Audit Transparency68 vs 44
Heaviest weighted swing
Bias Audit Transparency18% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Glider AI and Hogan Assessments are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

RecordGlider AIHogan Assessments
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20201987

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight76% of the movement so far

    Glider AI68
    Hogan Assessments44

    4.3 weighted points to Glider AI

  2. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight83% of the movement so far

    Glider AI52
    Hogan Assessments50

    0.4 weighted points to Glider AI

  3. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight89% of the movement so far

    Glider AI55
    Hogan Assessments52

    0.4 weighted points to Glider AI

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight95% of the movement so far

    Glider AI54
    Hogan Assessments52

    0.3 weighted points to Glider AI

  5. Customer Documentation

    8% weight97% of the movement so far

    Glider AI60
    Hogan Assessments62

    0.2 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

  6. FRIA Support

    15% weight100% of the movement so far

    Glider AI35
    Hogan Assessments36

    0.1 weighted points to Hogan Assessments

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +5.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +5.1.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Glider AI minus Hogan Assessments, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightGlider AIHogan AssessmentsΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5250+2+0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%6844+24+4.3
FRIA Support15%3536-1-0.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5452+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5552+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%52F47F+5+5.1

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightGlider AIHogan Assessments
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain40Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%276Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain206Sources on the vendor's own domain

Glider AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Glider AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Glider AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Glider AI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Hogan Assessments last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next