Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Glider AI vs Maki People
Glider AI
Glider AI is a skills-validation platform that screens and verifies candidates with auto-scored skills assessments and coding simulations, autonomous AI video and voice interviews that score responses against job requirements, live coding interviews, AI proctoring, and biometric ID verification.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Concerning
Assessment
The result
Maki People leads Glider AI on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Maki People opens a 15-point lead on Glider AI, 67 (D) to 52 (F), with both scored in the Assessment cohort. Maki People takes all 7 criteria and Glider AI none of them; the nearest contest is Data Governance Disclosure, Glider AI 54 to Maki People 64. The advantage Maki People holds is spread out: FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Glider AI 35, Maki People 62, 15% weight), yet it supplies only 28% of the weighted points Maki People gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Glider AI0
- Maki People7
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support35 vs 62
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Glider AI and Maki People are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Video interview.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Glider AI | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | FR |
| Founded | 2020 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight28% of the movement so far
Glider AI35Maki People624.0 weighted points to Maki People
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight45% of the movement so far
Glider AI52Maki People642.4 weighted points to Maki People
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight60% of the movement so far
Glider AI68Maki People802.2 weighted points to Maki People
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight73% of the movement so far
Glider AI40Maki People551.8 weighted points to Maki People
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight83% of the movement so far
Glider AI54Maki People641.5 weighted points to Maki People
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight92% of the movement so far
Glider AI55Maki People661.3 weighted points to Maki People
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Glider AI60Maki People741.1 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -14.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Glider AI minus Maki People, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Glider AI | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 64 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 80 | -12 | -2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 62 | -27 | -4.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 64 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 66 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 74 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 52F | 67D | -15 | -14.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Glider AI | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Glider AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Glider AI and Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Glider AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Glider AI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.