The result

1 point separates SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting and Glider AI.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds a 1-point edge over Glider AI under rubric v1.0, 53 to 52, across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Glider AI leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Glider AI — Glider AI 68, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40, on an 18% weight — which is 100% of the weighted advantage Glider AI holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Glider AI1
  • SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting4
  • Level2
Widest raw gap
Bias Audit Transparency68 vs 40
Heaviest weighted swing
Bias Audit Transparency18% weight

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Glider AI is filed under Assessment AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordGlider AISAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded20201972

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight48% of the movement so far

    Glider AI68
    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting40

    5.0 weighted points to Glider AI

  2. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight82% of the movement so far

    Glider AI52
    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting70

    3.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight91% of the movement so far

    Glider AI54
    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting60

    0.9 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight98% of the movement so far

    Glider AI55
    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting62

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    Glider AI60
    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting62

    0.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -0.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.5.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Glider AI minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightGlider AISAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5270-18-3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%6840+28+5.0
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5460-6-0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5562-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%52F53F-1-0.5

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightGlider AISAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on a separate domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%276Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Glider AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Glider AI and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Glider AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Glider AI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next