Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Glider AI vs Stepstone
Glider AI
Glider AI is a skills-validation platform that screens and verifies candidates with auto-scored skills assessments and coding simulations, autonomous AI video and voice interviews that score responses against job requirements, live coding interviews, AI proctoring, and biometric ID verification.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Stepstone
Stepstone is a German job marketplace whose Stepstone Recruit employer platform includes an AI Screening Agent, which rates each application against requirements taken from the job ad, and a Talent Finder, which recommends candidates from a CV database of more than 4 million profiles.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
3 points separate Glider AI and Stepstone.
Glider AI (Assessment) edges Stepstone (Screening) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 52 to 49. Glider AI leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Stepstone leads 3, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Glider AI 68, Stepstone 50) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 74% of the weighted advantage Glider AI holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Glider AI4
- Stepstone3
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency68 vs 50
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Glider AI is filed under Assessment AI, Stepstone under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Glider AI is in scope of
| Record | Glider AI | Stepstone |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | DE |
| Founded | 2020 | 1996 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight59% of the movement so far
Glider AI68Stepstone503.2 weighted points to Glider AI
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight73% of the movement so far
Glider AI35Stepstone300.8 weighted points to Glider AI
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight83% of the movement so far
Glider AI52Stepstone550.6 weighted points to Stepstone
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight90% of the movement so far
Glider AI55Stepstone580.4 weighted points to Stepstone
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight94% of the movement so far
Glider AI40Stepstone380.2 weighted points to Glider AI
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
Glider AI60Stepstone580.2 weighted points to Glider AI
- 7
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Glider AI54Stepstone550.1 weighted points to Stepstone
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Glider AI minus Stepstone, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Glider AI | Stepstone | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 50 | +18 | +3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 52F | 49F | +3 | +3.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Glider AI | Stepstone | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 29 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Glider AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Stepstone has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Glider AI and Stepstone sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Glider AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 33 for Stepstone, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Glider AI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Stepstone last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.