Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Glider AI vs Tezi
Glider AI
Glider AI is a skills-validation platform that screens and verifies candidates with auto-scored skills assessments and coding simulations, autonomous AI video and voice interviews that score responses against job requirements, live coding interviews, AI proctoring, and biometric ID verification.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Tezi leads Glider AI by 6 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Tezi, filed under Screening, finishes on 58 and Glider AI, filed under Assessment, on 52, 6 points apart. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Tezi, with 1 level: Tezi is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Glider AI on Customer Documentation. Tezi takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Glider AI 68, Tezi 83), which is 42% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Post-Market Monitoring, Glider AI 40 to Tezi 58.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Glider AI1
- Tezi5
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring40 vs 58
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Glider AI is filed under Assessment AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Glider AI is in scope of
| Record | Glider AI | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2024 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight37% of the movement so far
Glider AI68Tezi832.7 weighted points to Tezi
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight67% of the movement so far
Glider AI40Tezi582.2 weighted points to Tezi
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight81% of the movement so far
Glider AI55Tezi631.0 weighted points to Tezi
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight92% of the movement so far
Glider AI60Tezi500.8 weighted points to Glider AI
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Glider AI35Tezi380.4 weighted points to Tezi
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Glider AI54Tezi550.1 weighted points to Tezi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -5.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Glider AI minus Tezi, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Glider AI | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 52 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 83 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 63 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 52F | 58F | -6 | -5.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Glider AI | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Glider AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Glider AI and Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Glider AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Glider AI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.