Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs HiredScore
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
HiredScore takes the total, Gloat takes more of the criteria.
HiredScore scores 52 and Gloat 47 under rubric v1.0 — a 5-point gap inside the Sourcing cohort. Gloat leads more of the criteria than HiredScore — 4 to 3 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which HiredScore leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to HiredScore. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Gloat 48, HiredScore 65) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 50% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat4
- HiredScore3
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 65
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat and HiredScore are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | HiredScore |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight40% of the movement so far
Gloat48HiredScore653.4 weighted points to HiredScore
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight76% of the movement so far
Gloat38HiredScore553.1 weighted points to HiredScore
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight86% of the movement so far
Gloat42HiredScore350.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight92% of the movement so far
Gloat58HiredScore550.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight95% of the movement so far
Gloat28HiredScore300.3 weighted points to HiredScore
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight98% of the movement so far
Gloat62HiredScore600.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62HiredScore600.2 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -5.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus HiredScore, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | HiredScore | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 65 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -3.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 52F | -5 | -5.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | HiredScore | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 2 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiredScore last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against