HomeVendorsHiredScore
Profile · Vendor·SourcingATS-integrated

HiredScore

AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.

HireAIScore rates HiredScore 52 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed May 21, 2026. HiredScore ranks 19 of 49 vendors rated in Candidate sourcing AI, against a category average of 48. That score is drawn from 9 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for HiredScore — 7 with a cited source, 2 recording that nothing was located.

§ 01 - Company facts

Founded
2012
Headquarters
United States · US
Pricing tier
Enterprise
Market side
Employer-side (AEDT)
Categories
SourcingATS-integrated
Website
hiredscore.com

These are company details, not findings. They are editable by a verified representative and carry no weight in the score, which is built only from the cited evidence below.

§ 02 - Score breakdown

§ Score breakdown

Category scoring

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. 01

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20%

    65

    +13.0 · category avg 51

  2. 02

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18%

    55

    +9.9 · category avg 47

  3. 03

    FRIA Support

    Weight 15%

    30

    +4.5 · category avg 32

  4. 04

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15%

    55

    +8.3 · category avg 54

  5. 05

    Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12%

    60

    +7.2 · category avg 56

  6. 06

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12%

    35

    +4.2 · category avg 41

  7. 07

    Customer Documentation

    Weight 8%

    60

    +4.8 · category avg 57

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 49 Candidate sourcing AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Total weighted score: 51.8(rounded to 52 for display)

§ 03 - Strongest · weakest

Strongest category

Article 11 Technical Documentation

Raw score 65 · contributes 13.0 to total.

65 against a 51 category average

Weakest category

FRIA Support

Raw score 30 · contributes 4.5 to total.

30 against a 32 category average

§ 04 - Cited evidence

Download diligence record→

§ Evidence

Cited per category

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence.

Evidence ledger

Items
9
Documentation
6
Audit report
1
Absence
2
With a source URL
7 of 9
Source hostnames
1
Fewest items
1
Bias Audit Transparency

These figures measure how thoroughly HiredScore was reviewed, not how HiredScore performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

3 items65

Bias Audit Transparency

1 item55

FRIA Support

1 item30
  • AbsenceCaptured May 21, 2026

    No public material located as of 2026-05-21.

    Where we lookedNo FRIA template located, https://www.workday.com/en-us/legal/responsible-ai-and-bias-mitigation.html - no deployer FRIA materials.

    Have a URL that disputes this?→

Data Governance Disclosure

1 item55

Human Oversight Design

1 item60

Post-Market Monitoring

1 item35
  • AbsenceCaptured May 21, 2026

    No public material located as of 2026-05-21.

    Where we lookedhttps://www.workday.com/en-us/legal/responsible-ai-and-bias-mitigation.html - no vendor-specific incident channel beyond general Workday surfaces.

    Have a URL that disputes this?→

Customer Documentation

1 item60

§ 05 - Editorial notes

Company overview

HiredScore is an AI-driven talent-orchestration layer that sits on top of an existing ATS. Its core function is ranking incoming applicants and routing them through configurable workflows. Workday acquired HiredScore in 2024; the product continues to be sold and developed, and is also being integrated into Workday Recruiting AI features.

Regulatory exposure

Candidate ranking is squarely inside EU AI Act Annex III §4 - high-risk. NYC LL 144 applies whenever HiredScore's ranking decisions affect NYC candidates. Because HiredScore is now part of Workday, customers should also pay attention to how Workday's responsible-AI documentation maps onto the HiredScore product surface - disclosures that apply to "Workday" do not automatically apply to HiredScore.

Path to a higher score

To move into the B band on this rubric, HiredScore would need to publish (a) a current NYC LL 144 bias audit for the ranking and routing flows, (b) a model card for the ranking model with subgroup performance metrics, and (c) clear delineation of which Workday-level responsible-AI documents apply to the HiredScore product specifically.

§ Regulatory frame

What applies to candidate sourcing ai.

Ranking outputs are inside Annex III §4 when they influence hiring decisions. GDPR Article 22 (automated decision-making) and the GDPR rights around profiling apply independently for EU candidates.

Keep reading

All sourcing vendors→How this score is built→Annex IV section-by-section: what AI hiring vendors must document→What makes a defensible NYC LL 144 bias audit→

§ Compare

Build any comparison→

HiredScore against its nearest-scoring peers.

In Candidate sourcing AI.

§ Others rated in Candidate sourcing AI

All sourcing vendors→

Ranked 19 of 49 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. 16Bullhorn54F
  2. 17SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting53F
  3. 18Phenom52F
  4. 19HiredScoreThis profile52F
  5. 20Wellfound52F
  6. 21Textkernel51F

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.