Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs HirePro
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Gloat leads HirePro on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Gloat, filed under Sourcing, finishes on 47 and HirePro, filed under Screening, on 38, 9 points apart. Gloat takes all 7 criteria from HirePro without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is FRIA Support, Gloat 28 to HirePro 25. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Gloat 48, HirePro 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat7
- HirePro0
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HirePro under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | HirePro |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2015 | 2004 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight42% of the movement so far
Gloat48HirePro303.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight56% of the movement so far
Gloat58HirePro501.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight66% of the movement so far
Gloat38HirePro330.9 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight76% of the movement so far
Gloat62HirePro550.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight86% of the movement so far
Gloat42HirePro350.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight95% of the movement so far
Gloat62HirePro520.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28HirePro250.4 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +8.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +8.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus HirePro, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | HirePro | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 30 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 33 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 55 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 52 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 38F | +9 | +8.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | HirePro | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.